4.3 Review

Non-Viral Nucleic Acid Delivery: Key Challenges and Future Directions

期刊

CURRENT DRUG DELIVERY
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 235-244

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/156720111795256174

关键词

Gene therapy; nucleic acids delivery; viral vectors; non-viral vectors; plasmid DNA; antisense oligonucleotides; small interfering RNA; small hairpin RNA; micro RNA

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene therapy holds the promise of correcting a genetic defect. It can be achieved with the introduction of a normal wild-type transgene into specific cells of the patient where the endogenous gene is underexpressing or by the introduction of a therapeutic agent, such as, antisense oligonucleotides (AON) or small interfering RNA (siRNA) to inhibit transcription and/or translation of an overexpressing endogenous gene or a cancer causing oncogene. Gene therapy has been utilized for vaccination and for the treatment of several diseases, such as, cancer, viral infections and dermatological diseases. However, there are many hurdles to overcome in developing effective gene-based therapeutics, including cellular barriers, enzymatic degradation and rapid clearance after administration. Successful transfer of nucleic acids (e. g. plasmid DNA, AON, siRNA, small hairpin RNA and micro RNA) into cells usually relies on the use of efficient carriers, commonly viral or non-viral vectors. Presently, viral vectors are more efficient than non-viral systems. However, immunogenicity, inflammatory reactions and problems associated with scale-up limit their clinical use. The ideal carriers for gene delivery should be safe and yet ensure that the DNA/RNA survives the extra-and intracellular environment and efficiently transfer to the appropriate cellular compartments. This review discusses some of the strategies that have been employed to overcome the barriers towards successful gene delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据