4.0 Article

Structure of the SPRY domain of the human RNA helicase DDX1, a putative interaction platform within a DEAD-box protein

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X15013709

关键词

DEAD-box proteins; SPRY domains; RNA processing; protein-protein interaction

资金

  1. HBIGS graduate school
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [ME 3135/1-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human RNA helicase DDX1 in the DEAD-box family plays an important role in RNA processing and has been associated with HIV-1 replication and tumour progression. Whereas previously described DEAD-box proteins have a structurally conserved core, DDX1 shows a unique structural feature: a large SPRY-domain insertion in its RecA-like consensus fold. SPRY domains are known to function as protein-protein interaction platforms. Here, the crystal structure of the SPRY domain of human DDX1 (hDSPRY) is reported at 2.0 angstrom resolution. The structure reveals two layers of concave, antiparallel beta-sheets that stack onto each other and a third beta-sheet beneath the beta-sandwich. A comparison with SPRY-domain structures from other eukaryotic proteins showed that the general beta-sandwich fold is conserved; however, differences were detected in the loop regions, which were identified in other SPRY domains to be essential for interaction with cognate partners. In contrast, in hDSPRY these loop regions are not strictly conserved across species. Interestingly, though, a conserved patch of positive surface charge is found that may replace the connecting loops as a protein-protein interaction surface. The data presented here comprise the first structural information on DDX1 and provide insights into the unique domain architecture of this DEAD-box protein. By providing the structure of a putative interaction domain of DDX1, this work will serve as a basis for further studies of the interaction network within the hetero-oligomeric complexes of DDX1 and of its recruitment to the HIV-1 Rev protein as a viral replication factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据