4.2 Article

Systematic Analysis of the Association between Gut Flora and Obesity through High-Throughput Sequencing and Bioinformatics Approaches

期刊

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 2014, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2014/906168

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China [NSC 101-2311-B-009-005-MY3, NSC 102-2627-B-009-001]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 103-2221-E-038-013-MY2]
  3. UST-UCSD International Center of Excellence in Advanced Bioengineering - Ministry of Science and Technology I-RiCE Program [NSC-102-2911-I-009-101-]
  4. Veterans General Hospitals and University System of Taiwan (VGHUST) Joint Research Program [VGHUST103-G5-1-2]
  5. MOE ATU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eighty-one stool samples from Taiwanese were collected for analysis of the association between the gut flora and obesity. The supervised analysis showed that the most, abundant genera of bacteria in normal samples (from people with a body mass index (BMI) <= 24) were Bacteroides (27.7%), Prevotella (19.4%), Escherichia (12%), Phascolarctobacterium(3.9%), and Eubacterium (3.5%). The most abundant genera of bacteria in case samples (with a BMI >= 27) were Bacteroides (29%), Prevotella (21%), Escherichia (7.4%), Megamonas (5.1%), and Phascolarctobacterium (3.8%). A principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) demonstrated that normal samples were clustered more compactly than case samples. An unsupervised analysis demonstrated that bacterial communities in the gut were clustered into two main groups: N-like and OB-like groups. Remarkably, most normal samples (78%) were clustered in the N-like group, and most case samples (81%) were clustered in the OB-like group (Fisher's P value = 1.61E-07). The results showed that bacterial communities in the gut were highly associated with obesity. This is the first study in Taiwan to investigate the association between human gut flora and obesity, and the results provide new insights into the correlation of bacteria with the rising trend in obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据