4.2 Article

H-CRRETAWAC-OH, a Lead Structure for the Development of Radiotracer Targeting Integrin α5β1?

期刊

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 2014, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2014/243185

关键词

-

资金

  1. NihonMedi-Physics Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imaging of angiogenic processes is of great interest in preclinical research as well as in clinical settings. The most commonly addressed target structure for imaging angiogenesis is the integrin alpha(v)beta(3). Here we describe the synthesis and evaluation of [18 F] FProp-Cys *-Arg-Arg-Glu-Thr-Ala-Trp-Ala-Cys *-OH, a radiolabelled peptide designed to selectively target the integrin.. 5.. 1. Conjugation of 4-nitrophenyl-( RS)-2-[18 F] fluoropropionate provided [18 F] FProp-Cys *-Arg-Arg-Glu-Thr-Ala-Trp-Ala-Cys *-OH in high radiochemical purity (> 95%) and a radiochemical yield of approx. 55%. In vitro evaluation showed alpha(v)beta(3) binding affinity in the nanomolar range, whereas affinity to alpha(v)beta(3) and alpha(v)beta(3) was > 50.. M. Cell uptake studies using human melanoma M21 alpha(v)beta(3) 3 positive and.. 5.. 1 -negative), human melanoma M21-L alpha(v)beta(3) -negative and.. alpha(v)beta(3)-negative), and human prostate carcinoma DU145 alpha(v)beta(3) -negative and.. alpha(v)beta(3)-positive) confirmed receptor-specific binding. The radiotracer was stable in human serum and showed low protein binding. Biodistribution studies showed tumour uptake ranging from 2.5 to 3.5% ID/ g between 30 and 120 min post-injection. However, blocking studies and studies using mice bearing.. 5.. 1 -negative M21 tumours did not confirm receptorspecific uptake of [18 F] FProp-Cys *-Arg-Arg-Glu-Thr-Ala-Trp-Ala-Cys *-OH, although this radiopeptide revealed high affinity and substantial selectivity to alpha(v)beta(3) in vitro. Further experiments are needed to study the in vivo metabolism of this peptide and to develop improved radiopeptide candidates suitable for PET imaging of.. 5.. 1 expression in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据