4.5 Article

Effects of Different Spatial Precipitation Input Data on Crop Model Outputs under a Central European Climate

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos9080290

关键词

DSSAT; INCA; ASCAT soil moisture; SM2RAIN; satellite precipitation data

资金

  1. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [691998]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crop simulation models, which are mainly being utilized as tools to assess the consequences of a changing climate and different management strategies on crop production at the field scale, are increasingly being used in a distributed model at the regional scale. Spatial data analysis and modelling in combination with geographic information systems (GIS) integrates information from soil, climate, and topography data into a larger area, providing a basis for spatial and temporal analysis. In the current study, the crop growth model Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) was used to evaluate five gridded precipitation input data at three locations in Austria. The precipitation data sets consist of the INtegrated Calibration and Application Tool (INCA) from the Meteorological Service Austria, two satellite precipitation data sourcesMultisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and Climate Prediction Center MORPHing (CMORPH)and two rainfall estimates based on satellite soil moisture data. The latter were obtained through the application of the SM2RAIN algorithm (SM2R(ASC)) and a regression analysis (RA(ASC)) applied to the Metop-A/B Advanced SCATtermonter (ASCAT) soil moisture product during a 9-year period from 2007-2015. For the evaluation, the effect on winter wheat and spring barley yield, caused by different precipitation inputs, at a spatial resolution of around 25 km was used. The highest variance was obtained for the driest area with light-textured soils; TMPA and two soil moisture-based products show very good results in the more humid areas. The poorest performances at all three locations and for both crops were found with the CMORPH input data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据