4.5 Article

A Survey of Mercury in Air and Precipitation across Canada: Patterns and Trends

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 635-668

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos5030635

关键词

elemental mercury; total gaseous mercury; reactive mercury; gaseous oxidized mercury; particulate mercury; cycling of atmospheric mercury; mercury in precipitation; mercury trends

资金

  1. Environment Canada (EC)
  2. Northern Contaminants Program (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada)
  3. Geological Survey of Canada
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  5. Government of Canada
  6. EC's Global Atmospheric Watch program
  7. EC's Whistler program
  8. Manitoba Hydro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric mercury (Hg) measurements from across Canada were compiled and analysed as part of a national Hg science assessment. Here we update long-term trends of Hg in air and precipitation, and present more extensive measurements on patterns and trends in speciated Hg species (gaseous elemental mercury-GEM, reactive gaseous mercury-RGM, and total particulate mercury on particles < 2.5 mu m-TPM2.5) at several sites. A spatial analysis across Canada revealed higher air concentrations and wet deposition of Hg in the vicinity of local and regional emission sources, and lower air concentrations of Hg at mid-latitude maritime sites compared to continental sites. Diel and seasonal patterns in atmospheric GEM, RGM and TPM2.5 concentrations reflected differences in patterns of anthropogenic emissions, photo-induced surface emissions, chemistry, deposition and mixing. Concentrations of GEM decreased at rates ranging from -0.9% to -3.3% per year at all sites where measurements began in the 1990s. Concentrations of total Hg in precipitation declined up to 3.7% yr(-1). Trends in RGM and TPM2.5 were less clear due to shorter measurement periods and low concentrations, however, in spring at the high Arctic site (Alert) when RGM and TPM2.5 concentrations were high, concentrations of both increased by 7%-10% per year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据