4.1 Article

Loss of Annexin A1 Expression in Breast Cancer Progression

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31817432c3

关键词

ANXA1; breast carcinoma in situ; breast carcinoma

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA131183] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Annexin A1 (ANXA1) is a potential marker of development of breast cancer. However., previous Studies of ANXA1 expression in primary breast carcinoma and lymph node metastasis have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, to accurately characterize the ANXA1 expression pattern, we used microarray analysis and matched patient samples to evaluate progressive alterations in ANXA1 protein expression during malignant transformation and metastasis. Design: We constructed a tissue microarray using 82 pairs of primary breast cancers and lymph node metastases from archival materials. We also identified 21 cases of breast carcinoma for which a single slide contained the entire progression from benign breast tissue, carcinoma in situ, to invasive carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining for ANXA1 and various prognostic markers was performed. Result: Microarray analysis revealed that ANXA1 expression wits lost in 79% of breast carcinomas, and there was no difference in ANXA1 expression between primary breast carcinoma and lymph node metastasis. Most ANXA1-negative tumors were positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors but negative for HER2/neu and epidermal growth factor receptor. In contrast, most ANXA1-positive tumors were negative for estrogen, progesterone, and HER2/neu. In the whole tissue sections, ANXA1 is heterogeneously expressed in benign epithelium and is lost in both in situ carcinoma and invasive carcinoma. Conclusions: The lack of ANXA1 expression in the majority of breast carcinomas and the early loss of ANXA1 expression in in situ carcinoma, which is maintained in both invasive and metastatic tumors, Suggests a possible role for ANXA1 in the early events of malignant transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据