4.4 Review

Mechanisms of signal transduction by ethylene: overlapping and non-overlapping signalling roles in a receptor family

期刊

AOB PLANTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plt010

关键词

Arabidopsis; ethylene; ethylene receptors; histidine kinase; hormone signalling; sub-functionalization; two-component system

资金

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER15704]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-0918430]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0918430] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plant hormone ethylene regulates growth and development as well as responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Over the last few decades, key elements involved in ethylene signal transduction have been identified through genetic approaches, these elements defining a pathway that extends from initial ethylene perception at the endoplasmic reticulum to changes in transcriptional regulation within the nucleus. Here, we present our current understanding of ethylene signal transduction, focusing on recent developments that support a model with overlapping and non-overlapping roles for members of the ethylene receptor family. We consider the evidence supporting this model for sub-functionalization within the receptor family, and then discuss mechanisms by which such a sub-functionalization may occur. To this end, we consider the importance of receptor interactions in modulating their signal output and how such interactions vary in the receptor family. In addition, we consider evidence indicating that ethylene signal output by the receptors involves both phosphorylation-dependent and phosphorylation-independent mechanisms. We conclude with a current model for signalling by the ethylene receptors placed within the overall context of ethylene signal transduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据