4.6 Article

MOF-Derived Porous ZnO Nanocages/rGO/Carbon Sponge-Based Photocatalytic Microreactor for Efficient Degradation of Water Pollutants and Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 11989-11998

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02287

关键词

Carbon foam; Hollow ZnO nanocages; Photocatalysis; Pollutants degradation; Hydrogen production

资金

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [ZDSYS201602261932201, JCYJ20170412154335393, KQTD2016022619584022]
  2. Southern University of Science and Technology [G01296001]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control [2017B030301012]
  4. NSFC [51602143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semiconductor photocatalysts are of great importance for addressing current environmental and energy crises. However, traditional powdery photocatalytic materials suffer from drawbacks, including difficult separation and weak durability, which do not conform to the practical demand. Herein, we developed a simple dipping-pyrolysis route to fabricate a novel 3D structure photocatalytic microreactor, in which ZIF-8-derived hollow ZnO nanocages are uniformly and firmly distributed throughout the surface of reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-coated carbon sponge frameworks. The obtained carbon network based-porous ZnO bulky photocatalysts exhibit excellent adsorption and photocatalytic degradation performance for organic pollutant, as well as high solar hydrogen production activity. With robust structure, good maneuverability, and convenient recyclability, these monolithic microdevices show a promising prospect toward industrial photocatalytic applications in sustainable environmental remediation and renewable energy generation. Furthermore, our work also demonstrates a versatile synthetic strategy that can be extended to the design of a broad series of porous functional metal oxide/carbon foam bulk composites with high photocatalytic performance and general adaptability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据