4.6 Article

Iodine Treatment of Lignin-Cellulose Acetate Electrospun Fibers: Enhancement of Green Fiber Carbonization

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc500481k

关键词

Lignin; Carbon fiber; Electrospinning; Raman spectroscopy; Iodine

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canada [NSERC-NCE AUTO21]
  2. Ontario Research Fund, Research Excellence, Round-4 from the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation (MEDI) [ORF RE04]
  3. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (OMARA)- New Directions & Alternative Renewable Fuels Research program
  4. OMAFRA- University of Guelph Bioeconomy-Industrial uses Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pure biopolymer-based electrospun precursor carbon fibers are fabricated using an abundant and inexpensive biopolymer lignin blended with renewable resource-based cellulose acetate (CA). Iodine treatment on the fabricated green fiber was successfully performed in order to enhance the carbonization process as well as the retention of fiber morphology. The absorption mechanism of iodine by lignin and cellulose acetate and their derived electrospun green fibers has been investigated by means of thermal behavior and morphological retention. It was found that iodine treatment plays a vital role in altering the graphitization behavior as well as morphology retention during the carbonization process. With the help of iodine treatment, the green precursor fibers were successfully converted into thin carbon fibers, and scanning electron microscopy analysis confirmed the retention of fibrous structures with diameters around 250 nm. Raman spectroscopy revealed that although the overall level of graphitization was lower compared to polyacrylonitrile-based fibers, the graphitic crystallite size was larger in the produced carbon fibers. The produced pure biopolymer fibers and iodine treatments show promise for the production of green and cost-reduced carbon fibers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据