4.6 Article

Production of Ethylene Glycol and Its Monoether Derivative from Cellulose

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 2, 期 10, 页码 2355-2362

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc500380c

关键词

Cellulose; Ru/NbOPO4; Methanol; Ethylene glycol; Hydrogenation

资金

  1. NSFC of China [21101063, 21273071]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [13520711400, 13JC1401902, 10dz2220500]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficient usage of lignocellulosic biomass is of great significance for large-scale low-cost biomass conversion to biofuels and other useful chemicals. Here, an interesting catalytic process was reported related to converting cellulose into ethylene glycol (EG) and ethylene glycol monoether (EGME) in methanol over a Ru/NbOPO4 catalyst, with the cleavage of a C-C bond by NbOPO4 and further hydrogenation by supported Ru particles. The influence of reaction temperature, hydrogen pressure, and reaction time was systematically investigated and showed that a 54.5% total yield of EG and EGME could be obtained at 220 degrees C in 3 M Pa H-2, which was an exciting result. Meanwhile, the effect of solvent was also studied in detail. It was shown that methanol played an important role in the production of EG and EGME, especially in the cleavage of the C-C bond. Methanol could protect the C=O bond in glucose produced from cellulose through acetalization, thus prevent its hydrogenation, and led to the production of EG and EGME. Furthermore, the influence of dopants (W, Sn, Ni, Cu) was further investigated, and it was found that only the Ru-Ni/NbOPO4 catalyst was more effective through limiting the further hydrogenolysis of products (EG and EGME) to CO and alkanes, and as high as 64% total yield of EG+EGME was achieved. Moreover, the Ru-Ni/NbOPO4 catalyst showed good reusability, which can be reused at least four times with a little loss in EG and EGME yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据