4.6 Article

Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 910-917

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc400520x

关键词

Biocathode; Carbon capturing and sequestration; Microbial electrolysis cell; Power-to-gas; Microbially influenced corrosion; Carbon black; Graphite; Polyaciylonitrile

资金

  1. Global Climate and Energy Program (GCEP)
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-I1-003-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In methanogenic microbial electrolysis cells (MMCs), CO2 is reduced to methane using a methanogenic biofilm on the cathode by either direct electron transfer or evolved hydrogen. To optimize methane generation, we examined several cathode materials: plain graphite blocks, graphite blocks coated with carbon black or carbon black containing metals (platinum, stainless steel or nickel) or insoluble minerals (ferrihydrite, magnetite, iron sulfide, or molybdenum disulfide), and carbon fiber brushes. Assuming a stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen (abiotic):methane (biotic) of 4:1, methane production with platinum could be explained solely by hydrogen production. For most other materials, however, abiotic hydrogen production rates were insufficient to explain methane production. At -600 mV, platinum on carbon black had the highest abiotic hydrogen gas formation rate (1600 +/- 200 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) and the highest biotic methane production rate (250 +/- 90 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). At -550 mV, plain graphite (76 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) performed similarly to platinum (73 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). Coulombic recoveries, based on the measured current and evolved gas, were initially greater than 100% for all materials except platinum, suggesting that cathodic corrosion also contributed to electromethanogenic gas production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据