4.6 Article

Physical Insight into Switchgrass Dissolution in Ionic Liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Acetate

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 1264-1269

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc500088w

关键词

Ionic liquids; Switchgrass; Small-angle neutron scattering; Biopolymers; Physical entanglements; Biomass deconstruction

资金

  1. Genomic Science Program, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy [FWP ERKP7.52.]
  2. Office of Biological and Environmental Research [FWP ERKP291]
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory by the Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  5. 525 Solutions, Inc. as part of DOE SBIR Grant [DE-SC0004198]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small-angle neutron scattering was used to characterize solutions of switchgrass and the constituent biopolymers cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, as well as a physical mixture of them mimicking the composition of switchgrass, dissolved in the ionic liquid (IL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. The results demonstrate that the IL dissolves the cellulose fibrils of switchgrass, although a supramolecular biopolymer network remains that is not present in solutions of the individual biopolymers and that does not self-assemble in a solution containing the physical mixture of the individual biopolymers. The persistence of a network-like structure indicates that dissolving switchgrass in the IL does not disrupt all of the physical entanglements and covalent linkages between the biopolymers created during plant growth. Reconstitution of the IL-dissolved switchgrass yields carbohydrate-rich material containing cellulose with a low degree of crystallinity, as determined by powder X-ray diffraction, which would impact potential downstream uses of the biopolymers produced by the process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据