4.6 Article

Stabilization Mechanisms and Reaction Sequences for Sintering Simulated Copper-Laden Sludge with Alumina

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 1, 期 10, 页码 1239-1245

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc400087g

关键词

Copper aluminate; Reaction sequences; Stabilization; Sintering; Leaching behavior; Waste-to-resource

资金

  1. General Research Fund Scheme [HKU 716310E]
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [SEG_HKU10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To stabilize copper-laden sludge using alumina-based ceramic raw materials, this study quantifies the copper transformation behavior during the sintering process. Results indicate crystallochemical incorporation of hazardous copper through the formation of copper aluminate spinel (CuAl2O4) and cuprous aluminate (CuAlO2). To quantify the copper transformation and reveal reaction sequences, CuO was mixed with gamma-Al2O3 and alpha-Al2O3 precursors and fired at 1050-1150 degrees C for 15-180 min. The sintered products were examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), and copper transformations into both aluminate phases were quantitatively determined through Rietveld refinement analysis of XRD data. When gamma-Al2O3 was used, CuAlO2 was predominately generated from CuAl2O4 decomposition. However, CuAlO2 was largely generated by the interaction between CuO and alpha-Al2O3. This study also compared the sintering behavior of both precursor systems and observed the relatively slower decomposition of CuAl2O4 in the gamma-Al2O3 system. The reoxidation of CuAlO2 into CuAl2O4 with an extended sintering time was detected in the alpha-Al2O3 system. The sample leachability analysis reveals that both CuAl2O4 and CuA(1)O(2) structures were superior in copper stabilization compared to the oxide forms. Such results suggest reliable mechanisms of incorporating hazardous copper into a ceramic matrix and demonstrate the potential of using waste materials as part of ceramic raw materials to produce detoxified products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据