4.1 Article

Enhancing resilience in urban water systems for future cities

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 1343-1352

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2015.098

关键词

flexibility; pipe failure; redundancy; resilience; urban water systems

资金

  1. UK Commonwealth PhD scholarship
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (ESPRC) [EP/K006924/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K006924/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/K006924/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In future cities, urban water systems (UWSs) should be designed not only for safe provision of services but should also be resilient to emerging or unexpected threats that lead to catastrophic system failure impacts and consequences. Resilience can potentially be built into UWSs by implementing a range of strategies, for example by embedding redundancy and flexibility in system design, or by rehabilitation to increase their ability to maintain acceptable customer service levels during unexpected system failures. In this work, a new resilience analysis is carried out to investigate the performance of a water distribution system (WDS) and an urban drainage system (UDS) during pipe failure scenarios. Using simplified synthetic networks, the effect of implementing adaptation (resilient design) strategies on minimising the loss of system functionality and cost of UWSs is investigated. Study results for the WDS case study show that the design strategy in which flexibility is enhanced ensures that all customers are served during single pipe failure scenarios. The results of the UDS case study indicate that the design strategy incorporating upstream distributed storage tanks minimises flood volume and mean duration of nodal flooding by 50.1% and 46.7%, respectively, even when system functionality is significantly degraded. When costs associated with failure are considered, resilient design strategies could prove to be more cost-effective over the design life of UWSs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据