4.5 Review

Guarding the 'translation apparatus': defective ribosome biogenesis and the p53 signaling pathway

期刊

WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 507-522

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wrna.73

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [21790288, 22790989, 22370065]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22370065, 22790989, 21790288] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ribosomes, the molecular factories that carry out protein synthesis, are essential for every living cell. Ribosome biogenesis, the process of ribosome synthesis, is highly complex and energy consuming. Over the last decade, many exciting and novel findings have linked various aspects of ribosome biogenesis to cell growth and cell cycle control. Defects in ribosome biogenesis have also been linked to human diseases. It is now clear that disruption of ribosome biogenesis causes nucleolar stress that triggers a p53 signaling pathway, thus providing cells with a surveillance mechanism for monitoring ribosomal integrity. Although the exact mechanisms of p53 induction in response to nucleolar stress are still unknown, several ribosomal proteins have been identified as key players in this ribosome-p53 signaling pathway. Recent studies of human ribosomal pathologies in a variety of animal models have also highlighted the role of this pathway in the pathophysiology of these diseases. However, it remains to be understood why the effect of ribosomal malfunction is not a universal response in all cell types but is restricted to particular tissues, causing the specific phenotypes seen in ribosomal diseases. A challenge for future studies will be to identify additional players in this signaling pathway and to elucidate the underlyingmolecular mechanisms that link defective ribosome synthesis to p53. (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs RNA 2011 2 507-522 DOI:10.1002/wrna.73

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据