4.4 Article

Chemical Pretreatment of Sunflower Straw Biomass: The Effect on Chemical Composition and Structural Changes

期刊

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 733-746

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-015-9388-x

关键词

Lignocellulosic biomass; Pretreatment; Sunflower straw; SEM images; IR spectroscopy; Pretreatment severity; Inhibitors; Chemical composition

资金

  1. Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology [POST-DOC_PE8(1756)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, various pretreatment methods, such as thermal (24 h at 80 A degrees C; 1 h at 120 A degrees C), alkaline (2-20 g IeaIYIu/100 g TS, 24 h at 80 A degrees C) and acid (2-20 g Iu(2)SO(4)/100 g TS, 1 h at 120 C-omicron; 2-20 g Iu(3)PO(4)/100 g TS, 1 h at 120 A degrees C; 2-20 g HCl/100 g TS, 1 h at 120 A degrees C), were applied on sunflower straw biomass and the effect of each pretreatment method on the fractionation of the lignocellulosic content was evaluated. Experiments showed that pretreatment with the acids led to higher hemicellulose solubilization, while lignin degradation was achieved when the sunflower was treated with NaOH. Higher acids concentration led to higher solubilization of hemicellulose and higher concentrations of released furaldehydes (5-hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural) and aliphatic acids (i.e. formic and acetic acid). On the contrary, the higher the NaOH concentration, the higher was the phenolics concentration observed. Scanning electron microscopy images revealed a change in morphology after different pretreatment methods, compared to the raw substrate. Thus, disruption of the outer layers and removal of mass from the initial connected structure were observed, for all pretreated feedstocks. Complete analysis of the liquid fractions obtained after pretreatment, led to the estimation of the ratio of sum of soluble sugars concentration to the sum of inhibitors concentration (I (soluble pound sugars)/I (inhibitors)) pound, which characterizes the fermentability of the sunflower straw hydrolysates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据