4.6 Article

Depressive-Like Behaviors in a Rat Model of Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 207-214

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12975-014-0385-3

关键词

Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion; Vascular depression; Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis; Glucocorticoid receptor; Rat model

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0008867]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0008867] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vascular depression hypothesis suggests that there is an association between cerebrovascular pathophysiology and depression in the elderly. We investigated depressive-like behaviors and perturbations in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. We modeled chronic cerebral hypoperfusion by permanent occlusion of the bilateral common carotid arteries (BCCAo) in Wistar rats. Sucrose preference, forced swim, and social interaction tests were performed to measure depressive-like behaviors. The plasma levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone, and the hippocampal expression of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) were assessed. Sucrose preference (P = 0.045) and social withdrawal (P = 0.038) were significantly enhanced in BCCAo rats. Increased plasma levels of corticosterone (P = 0.034) and impaired cytosolic-to-nuclear translocation of the GR protein were observed in the hippocampus (P = 0.038) of BCCAo rats. Our experimental results support the clinical hypothesis that vascular depression can be induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Increased HPA axis activity and perturbation of the GR signaling pathway in the hippocampus may be associated with depressive-like behaviors in rats with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据