4.7 Article

Vixapatin (VP12), a C-Type Lectin-Protein from Vipera xantina palestinae Venom: Characterization as a Novel Anti-angiogenic Compound

期刊

TOXINS
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 862-877

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins4100862

关键词

C-type lectin protein; Vixapatin (VP12); alpha 2 beta 1; integrin; adhesion; migration; tube formation; Matrigel; CAM assay; angiogenesis

资金

  1. David R. Bloom Center for Pharmacy
  2. Adolf and Klara Brettler Center for Research in Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
  3. German-Israeli Foundation [GIF-994-3.9/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A C-type lectin-like protein (CTL), originally identified as VP12 and lately named Vixapatin, was isolated and characterized from Israeli viper Vipera xantina palestinae snake venom. This CTL was characterized as a selective alpha 2 beta 1 integrin inhibitor with anti-melanoma metastatic activity. The major aim of the present study was to prove the possibility that this protein is also a potent novel anti-angiogenic compound. Using an adhesion assay, we demonstrated that Vixapatin selectively and potently inhibited the alpha 2 mediated adhesion of K562 over-expressing cells, with IC50 of 3 nM. 3 nM Vixapatin blocked proliferation of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC); 25 nM inhibited collagen I induced migration of human fibrosarcoma HT-1080 cells; and 50 nM rat C6 glioma and human breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells. 1 mu M Vixapatin reduced HDMEC tube formation by 75% in a Matrigel assay. Furthermore, 1 mu M Vixapatin decreased by 70% bFGF-induced physiological angiogenesis, and by 94% C6 glioma-induced pathological angiogenesis, in shell-less embryonic quail chorioallantoic membrane assay. Vixapatin's ability to inhibit all steps of the angiogenesis process suggest that it is a novel pharmacological tool for studying alpha 2 beta 1 integrin mediated angiogenesis and a lead compound for the development of a novel anti-angiogenic/angiostatic/anti-cancer drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据