4.6 Article

Glioma-Initiating Cell Elimination by Metformin Activation of FOXO3 via AMPK

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 1, 期 11, 页码 811-824

出版社

ALPHAMED PRESS
DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0058

关键词

Cancer; Cell biology; Cell signaling; Glioma

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Global COE Program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [23-A-20]
  4. Japan Brain Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23791585, 24650644, 24390338] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Control of the cancer stem/initiating cell population is considered key to realizing the long-term survival of glioblastoma patients. Recently, we demonstrated that FOXO3 activation is sufficient to induce differentiation of glioma-initiating cells having stem-like properties and inhibit their tumor-initiating potential. Here we identified metformin, an antidiabetic agent, as a therapeutic activator of FOXO3. Metformin activated FOXO3 and promoted differentiation of such stem-like glioma-initiating cells into nontumorigenic cells. Furthermore, metformin promoted FOXO3 activation and differentiation via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, which was sensitive to extracellular glucose availability. Importantly, transient, systemic administration of metformin depleted the self-renewing and tumor-initiating cell population within established tumors, inhibited tumor formation by stem-like glioma-initiating cells in the brain, and provided a substantial survival benefit. Our findings demonstrate that targeting glioma-initiating cells via the AMPK-FOXO3 axis is a viable therapeutic strategy against glioblastoma, with metformin being the most clinically relevant drug ever reported for targeting of glioma-initiating cells. Our results also establish a novel, direct link between glucose metabolism and cancer stem/initiating cells. STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2012;1:811-824

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据