4.7 Article

Surface Daytime Net Radiation Estimation Using Artificial Neural Networks

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 11031-11050

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs61111031

关键词

Net radiation; Artificial Neural Network; modeling; remotely sensed products

资金

  1. National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA122800]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41401381, 41101310, 41331173]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013NT28]
  4. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2012DFG21710]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Carbon Program [DE-FG02-04ER63917]
  6. CarboEuropeIP
  7. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  8. Ileaps
  9. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  10. National Science Foundation
  11. University of Tuscia
  12. Universite Laval
  13. Environment Canada
  14. U.S. Department of Energy
  15. CFCAS
  16. NSERC
  17. BIOCAP
  18. NRCan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Net all-wave surface radiation (R-n) is one of the most important fundamental parameters in various applications. However, conventional R-n measurements are difficult to collect because of the high cost and ongoing maintenance of recording instruments. Therefore, various empirical R-n estimation models have been developed. This study presents the results of two artificial neural network (ANN) models (general regression neural networks (GRNN) and Neuroet) to estimate R-n globally from multi-source data, including remotely sensed products, surface measurements, and meteorological reanalysis products. R-n estimates provided by the two ANNs were tested against in-situ radiation measurements obtained from 251 global sites between 1991-2010 both in global mode (all data were used to fit the models) and in conditional mode (the data were divided into four subsets and the models were fitted separately). Based on the results obtained from extensive experiments, it has been proved that the two ANNs were superior to linear-based empirical models in both global and conditional modes and that the GRNN performed better and was more stable than Neuroet. The GRNN estimates had a determination coefficient (R-2) of 0.92, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 34.27 W.m(-2), and a bias of -0.61 W.m(-2) in global mode based on the validation dataset. This study concluded that ANN methods are a potentially powerful tool for global R-n estimation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据