4.7 Article

Remote Sensing-Based Biomass Estimation and Its Spatio-Temporal Variations in Temperate Grassland, Northern China

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 1496-1513

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs6021496

关键词

biomass; vegetation index; MODIS; temperate grassland; Xilingol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31372354]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFR30760]
  3. Agricultural Scientific Research Fund of Outstanding Talents
  4. Open Fund for the Key Laboratory of Agri-informatics, Ministry of Agriculture, China [2013010]
  5. Grassland Monitoring and Supervision Center Ministry of Agriculture, China [326-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grassland biomass is essential for maintaining grassland ecosystems. Moreover, biomass is an important characteristic of grassland. In this study, we combined field sampling with remote sensing data and calculated five vegetation indices (VIs). Using this combined information, we quantified a remote sensing estimation model and estimated biomass in a temperate grassland of northern China. We also explored the dynamic spatio-temporal variation of biomass from 2006 to 2012. Our results indicated that all VIs investigated in the study were strongly correlated with biomass (alpha < 0.01). The precision of the model for estimating biomass based on ground data and remote sensing was greater than 73%. Additionally, the results of our analysis indicated that the annual average biomass was 11.86 million tons and that the average yield was 604.5 kg/ha. The distribution of biomass exhibited substantial spatial heterogeneity, and the biomass decreased from the eastern portion of the study area to the western portion. The interannual biomass exhibited strong fluctuations during 2006-2012, with a coefficient of variation of 26.95%. The coefficient of variation of biomass differed among the grassland types. The highest coefficient of variation was found for the desert steppe, followed by the typical steppe and the meadow steppe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据