4.7 Article

High-Resolution Imagery of Earth at Night: New Sources, Opportunities and Challenges

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 1-23

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/rs70100001

关键词

artificial light; energy; international space station; light pollution; night; remote sensing; visible band

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF-033L038A]
  2. Berlin Senate Department for Economics, Technology and Research (Lichtimmissionen im offentlichen Raum)
  3. FPU grant (Formacion de Profesorado Universitario) from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCINN)
  4. Spanish Network for Light Pollution Studies [AYA2011-15808-E]
  5. [AYA2012-31277]
  6. [AYA2013-46724-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Images of the Earth at night are an exceptional source of human geographical data, because artificial light highlights human activity in a way that daytime scenes do not. The quality of such imagery dramatically improved in 2012 with two new spaceborne detectors. The higher resolution and precision of the data considerably expands the scope of possible applications. In this paper, we introduce the two new data sources and discuss their potential limitations using three case studies. Data from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite Day-Night Band (VIIRS DNB) is shown to have sufficient resolution to identify major sources of waste light, such as airports, and we find considerable variation in the peak radiance of the world's largest airports. Nighttime imagery brings cultural footprints to light: DNB data reveals that American cities emit many times more light per capita than German cities and that cities in the former East of Germany emit more light per capita than those in the former West. Photographs from the International Space Station, the second new source of imagery, provide some limited spectral information, as well as street-level resolution. These images may be of greater use for epidemiological studies than the lower resolution DNB data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据