4.7 Article

Multi-Year Comparison of Carbon Dioxide from Satellite Data with Ground-Based FTS Measurements (2003-2011)

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 3431-3456

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs5073431

关键词

greenhouse gases; remote sensing retrievals; carbon dioxide; validation

资金

  1. NASA's Terrestrial Ecology Program
  2. Orbiting Carbon Observatory
  3. Public Welfare Special Program, Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China [200909018]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41001215]
  5. LREIS, CAS
  6. Gray Haze Remote Sensing Monitoring Technology Research and Operation Demonstration of JiangSu Province [201130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a comparison of CO2 products derived from Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY), Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), with reference to calibration data obtained using the high-resolution ground-based Fourier Transform Spectrometers (g-b FTS) in the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). Based on the monthly averages, we calculate the global offsets and regional relative precisions between satellite products and g-b FTS measurements. The results are as follows: the monthly means of SCIAMACHY data are systemically slightly lower than g-b FTS, but limited in coverage; the GOSAT data are superior in stability, but inferior in systematic error; the mean difference between AIRS data and that of g-b FTS is small; and the monthly global coverage is above 95%. Therefore, the AIRS data are better than the other two satellite products in both coverage and accuracy. We also estimate linear trends based on monthly mean data and find that the differences between the satellite products and the g-b FTS data range from 0.25 ppm (SCIAMACHY) to 1.26 ppm (AIRS). The latitudinal distributions of the zonal means of the three satellite products show similar spatial features. The seasonal cycle of satellite products also illustrates the same trend with g-b FTS observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据