4.7 Article

Species-Level Differences in Hyperspectral Metrics among Tropical Rainforest Trees as Determined by a Tree-Based Classifier

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 1820-1855

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs4061820

关键词

tropical rainforests; individual tree species classification; imaging spectroscopy; hyperspectral sensors; high spatial resolution; Random Forests; leaf and bark spectral properties

资金

  1. NASA Headquarters under the Earth System Science Fellowship [NGT5-30436]
  2. California Space Grant Graduate Fellowship
  3. National Science Foundation's LTREB program [DEB-0640206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores a method to classify seven tropical rainforest tree species from full-range (400-2,500 nm) hyperspectral data acquired at tissue (leaf and bark), pixel and crown scales using laboratory and airborne sensors. Metrics that respond to vegetation chemistry and structure were derived using narrowband indices, derivative- and absorption-based techniques, and spectral mixture analysis. We then used the Random Forests tree-based classifier to discriminate species with minimally-correlated, importance-ranked metrics. At all scales, best overall accuracies were achieved with metrics derived from all four techniques and that targeted chemical and structural properties across the visible to shortwave infrared spectrum (400-2500 nm). For tissue spectra, overall accuracies were 86.8% for leaves, 74.2% for bark, and 84.9% for leaves plus bark. Variation in tissue metrics was best explained by an axis of red absorption related to photosynthetic leaves and an axis distinguishing bark water and other chemical absorption features. Overall accuracies for individual tree crowns were 71.5% for pixel spectra, 70.6% crown-mean spectra, and 87.4% for a pixel-majority technique. At pixel and crown scales, tree structure and phenology at the time of image acquisition were important factors that determined species spectral separability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据