4.7 Article

Object-Based Image Analysis of Downed Logs in Disturbed Forested Landscapes Using Lidar

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 3, 期 11, 页码 2420-2439

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs3112420

关键词

lidar; Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA); downed logs; downed dead wood

资金

  1. USDA Forest Service Region 5
  2. USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station
  3. US Fish and Wildlife Service
  4. California Department of Water Resources
  5. California Department of Fish and Game
  6. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
  7. Sierra Nevada Conservancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Downed logs on the forest floor provide habitat for species, fuel for forest fires, and function as a key component of forest nutrient cycling and carbon storage. Ground-based field surveying is a conventional method for mapping and characterizing downed logs but is limited. In addition, optical remote sensing methods have not been able to map these ground targets due to the lack of optical sensor penetrability into the forest canopy and limited sensor spectral and spatial resolutions. Lidar (light detection and ranging) sensors have become a more viable and common data source in forest science for detailed mapping of forest structure. This study evaluates the utility of discrete, multiple return airborne lidar-derived data for image object segmentation and classification of downed logs in a disturbed forested landscape and the efficiency of rule-based object-based image analysis (OBIA) and classification algorithms. Downed log objects were successfully delineated and classified from lidar derived metrics using an OBIA framework. 73% of digitized downed logs were completely or partially classified correctly. Over classification occurred in areas with large numbers of logs clustered in close proximity to one another and in areas with vegetation and tree canopy. The OBIA methods were found to be effective but inefficient in terms of automation and analyst's time in the delineation and classification of downed logs in the lidar data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据