3.9 Article

Fluticasone furoate nasal spray reduces symptoms of uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis: a randomised placebo-controlled study

期刊

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 267-275

出版社

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY SOC-PCRS UK
DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00039

关键词

acute rhinosinusitis; intranasal corticosteroid; monotherapy; randomised; placebo-controlled; symptomatic therapy

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline [FFS113203, NCT01018030]
  2. Merck
  3. Nycomed
  4. Allergy Therapeutics
  5. Allergopharma
  6. Altana/Nycomed
  7. Astra Zeneca
  8. Bohringer Ingelheim
  9. Chesi
  10. Encorium
  11. Fujisawa
  12. Hexal
  13. LEK
  14. Mudipharma
  15. Pfizer
  16. UCB
  17. ALK-Abello, Denmark
  18. Allergopharma, Germany
  19. Stallergenes, France
  20. HAL, The Netherlands
  21. Artu Biologicals, The Netherlands
  22. Allergy-Therapeutics/Bencard, UK/Germany
  23. Hartington, Spain
  24. Lofarma, Italy
  25. Novartis/Leti, Germany/Spain
  26. GlaxoSmithKline, UK/Germany
  27. Essex-Pharma, Germany
  28. Cytos, Switzerland
  29. Curalogic, Denmark
  30. Roxall, Germany
  31. Stallargens
  32. Medtronic
  33. HAL
  34. Optinose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is usually a self-limiting inflammatory condition often treated with antibiotics. Aims: To assess the safety and efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) compared with placebo for symptomatic relief of uncomplicated ARS. Methods: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, 2-week treatment study of FFNS 110 mu g once and twice daily was undertaken in adults/adolescents. Results: A statistically significant reduction was seen in the daily major symptoms score, a composite score of three individual symptoms (nasal congestion/stuffiness, sinus headache/pressure or facial pain/pressure, and postnasal drip on a 0-3 scale) by both FFNS doses compared with placebo (least square mean differences vs. placebo of -0.386 (p=0.008) and -0.357 (p=0.014) for once daily and twice daily FFNS, respectively). The differences in median times to symptom improvement were not statistically significant between each dose of FFNS (7 days) and placebo (8 days). There were no treatment differences in antibiotic use for possible fulminant bacterial rhinosinusitis (3% in each group). The safety profile of FFNS was similar to placebo. Conclusions: FFNS reduces symptoms of uncomplicated ARS compared with placebo and is well tolerated, providing support for withholding antibiotics in selected patients. (C) 2012 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK. All rights reserved. PK Keith et al. Prim Care Respir J 2012; 21(3): 267-275 http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2012.00039

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据