3.9 Article

Severity assessment for lower respiratory tract infections: potential use and validity of the CRB-65 in primary care

期刊

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 65-70

出版社

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY SOC-PCRS UK
DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00083

关键词

risk assessment; lower respiratory tract infections; primary health care; cough; prognosis; CRB-65

资金

  1. European Commission [LSHM-CT-2005-518226]
  2. National Institute for Social Care and Health Research in Wales
  3. Research Foundation, Flanders [G.F0274.08N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To explore the potential use of the CRB-65 rule (based on Confusion, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure and age >65 years) in adults with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in primary care. Methods: Primary care clinicians in 13 European countries recorded antibiotic treatment and clinical features for adults with LRTI. Patients recorded daily symptoms. Multilevel regression models determined the association between an elevated CRB-65 score and prolonged moderately severe symptoms, hospitalisation, and time to recovery. Sensitivity analyses used zero imputation. Results: Respiratory rate and blood pressure were recorded in 22.7% and 31.9% of patients, respectively. A total of 2,690 patients completed symptom diaries. The CRB-65 could be calculated for 339 (12.6%). A score of >= 1 was not significantly associated with prolonged moderately severe symptoms (odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% Cl 0.04 to 4.19) or hospitalisations (OR 3.12, 95% Cl 0.16 to 60.24), but was associated with prolonged time to self-reported recovery when using zero imputation (hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% Cl 0.64 to 0.88). Conclusions: Respiratory rate and blood pressure are infrequently measured in adults with LRTI. We found no evidence to support using the CRB-65 rule in the assessment of LRTI in primary care. However, it is unclear whether it is of value if used only in patients where the primary care clinician suspects pneumonia. (C) 2012 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK. All rights reserved. NA Francis et al. Prim Care Respir J 2012; 21(1): 65-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2011.00083

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据