3.9 Review

Herbal interventions for chronic asthma in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 307-314

出版社

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY SOC-PCRS UK
DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2010.00041

关键词

asthma; herbal; complementary; systematic review; meta-analysis

资金

  1. St George's, University of London UK
  2. Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry/Plymouth teaching PCT UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To assess the efficacy of herb and plant extracts in the management of asthma. Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple database searches identified randomised placebo controlled trials of herbal interventions reporting at least one primary outcome measure. Where possible data were combined for meta-analysis. Primary outcome measures were lung function, exacerbations and reduction in corticosteroid use. Secondary outcome measures were symptoms and symptom scores, use of reliever medications, changes in rates of consultation and adverse effects. Results: Twenty-six studies reporting on 20 herbal preparations were included. Two of six studies reporting change in FEV1 were positive. Little data was available on frequency of exacerbations. For primary outcomes single studies of Boswellia, Mai-Men-Dong-Tang, Pycnogenol, Jia-Wei-Si-Jun-Zi-Tang and Tylophora indica showed potential to improve lung function, and a study of 1.8-Cineol (eucalyptol) showed reduced daily oral steroid dosage. Conclusions: Improvements in symptoms were not strongly supported by objective changes. Most trials were of small sample size, short duration, and poor methodology. Further adequately powered trials are needed to assess these compounds. Such trials should conform to CONSORT guidance, report standardised spirometry, and use validated symptom and severity scores. No recommendations for herbal treatment of asthma can be made from the current evidence. (c) 2010 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK. All rights reserved. C Clark et al. Prim Care Resp J 2010; 19(4): 307-314 doi:10.4104/pcrj.2010.00041

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据