4.7 Article

Co-ordinated Role of TLR3, RIG-I and MDA5 in the Innate Response to Rhinovirus in Bronchial Epithelium

期刊

PLOS PATHOGENS
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001178

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Lung Foundation (BLF) [P06/3]
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [G0601236]
  3. Asthma UK [RF07/04, 02/027, 05/067]
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. British Medical Association
  6. British Lung Foundation/Severin Wunderman Family Foundation [P00/2]
  7. Wellcome Trust [083567/Z/07/Z]
  8. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  9. Imperial College
  10. Asthma UK [05/067, RF07/04] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E52708X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [G0700552, G0601236] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. BBSRC [BB/E52708X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. MRC [G0700552, G0601236] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relative roles of the endosomal TLR3/7/8 versus the intracellular RNA helicases RIG-I and MDA5 in viral infection is much debated. We investigated the roles of each pattern recognition receptor in rhinovirus infection using primary bronchial epithelial cells. TLR3 was constitutively expressed; however, RIG-I and MDA5 were inducible by 8-12 h following rhinovirus infection. Bronchial epithelial tissue from normal volunteers challenged with rhinovirus in vivo exhibited low levels of RIG-I and MDA5 that were increased at day 4 post infection. Inhibition of TLR3, RIG-I and MDA5 by siRNA reduced innate cytokine mRNA, and increased rhinovirus replication. Inhibition of TLR3 and TRIF using siRNA reduced rhinovirus induced RNA helicases. Furthermore, IFNAR1 deficient mice exhibited RIG-I and MDA5 induction early during RV1B infection in an interferon independent manner. Hence anti-viral defense within bronchial epithelium requires co-ordinated recognition of rhinovirus infection, initially via TLR3/TRIF and later via inducible RNA helicases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据