4.5 Article

Relationship between Serum Antibodies and Taenia solium Larvae Burden in Pigs Raised in Field Conditions

期刊

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002192

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 AI35894]
  2. Wellcome Trust, UK [USA 063109]
  3. National Institutes of Health, USA [P01 AI51976, TW05562]
  4. Food and Drug Administration [01107]
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA [23981]
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K007467/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [MR/K007467/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Serological tests have been used for the diagnosis of Taenia solium infection in pigs. However, those serological results do not necessarily correlate with the actual infection burden after performing pig necropsy. This study aimed to evaluate the Electro Immuno Transfer Blot (EITB) seropositivity with infection burden in naturally infected pigs. Methodology/Principal Findings: In an endemic area of Peru, 476 pigs were sampled. Seroprevalence was 60.5 +/- 4.5% with a statistically higher proportion of positive older pigs (>8 months) than young pigs. The logistic model showed that pigs >8 month of age were 2.5 times more likely to be EITB-positive than <= 8 months. A subset of 84 seropositive pigs were necropsied, with 45.2% (38/84) positive to 1-2 bands, 46.4% (39/84) to 3 bands, and 8.3% (7/84) to 4+ bands. 41 out of 84 positive pigs were negative to necropsy (48.8%) and 43 (51%) had one or more cysts (positive predictive value). Older pigs showed more moderate and heavy infection burdens compared to younger pigs. In general, regardless of the age of the pig, the probability of having more cysts (parasite burden) increases proportionally with the number of EITB bands. Conclusions/Significance: The probability of being necropsy-positive increased with the number of bands, and age. Therefore, the EITB is a measure of exposure rather than a test to determine the real prevalence of cysticercosis infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据