4.5 Article

The Influence of Reduced Susceptibility to Fluoroquinolones in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi on the Clinical Response to Ofloxacin Therapy

期刊

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001163

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust of Great Britain, Euston Road, London, United Kingdom
  2. OAK Foundation through Oxford University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones has been associated with fluoroquinolone treatment failure. We studied the relationship between ofloxacin treatment response and the ofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting isolate. Individual patient data from seven randomised controlled trials of antimicrobial treatment in enteric fever conducted in Vietnam in which ofloxacin was used in at least one of the treatment arms was studied. Data from 540 patients randomised to ofloxacin treatment was analysed to identify an MIC of the infecting organism associated with treatment failure. Principal Findings: The proportion of patients failing ofloxacin treatment was significantly higher in patients infected with S. Typhi isolates with an MIC >= 0.25 mu g/mL compared with those infections with an MIC of <= 0.125 mu g/mL (p < 0.001). Treatment success was 96% when the ofloxacin MIC was <= 0.125 mu g/mL, 73% when the MIC was between 0.25 and 0.50 mu g/mL and 53% when the MIC was 1.00 mu g/mL. This was despite a longer duration of treatment at a higher dosage in patients infected with isolates with an MIC >= 0.25 mu g/mL compared with those infections with an MIC of <= 0.125 mu g/mL. Significance: There is a clear relationship between ofloxacin susceptibility and clinical outcome in ofloxacin treated patients with enteric fever. An ofloxacin MIC of >= 0.25 mu g/mL, or the presence of nalidixic acid resistance, can be used to define S. Typhi infections in which the response to ofloxacin may be impaired.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据