4.6 Article

Multidrug Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment Regimens and Patient Outcomes: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of 9,153 Patients

期刊

PLOS MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001300

关键词

-

资金

  1. USAID
  2. US Centers for Disease Control Cooperative Agreement Funds
  3. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [FP7-223681]
  4. Mexican Secretariat of Health
  5. National Institutes of Health of the United States [A135969, K01TW000001]
  6. Wellcome Trust [176W009]
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55000632]
  8. Mexican Council of Science and Technology [SEP 2004-C01-47499, FOSSIS 2005-2, FOSSIS 14475, FOSSIS 87332]
  9. South African Medical Research Council
  10. Fonds de Recherche en Sante de Quebec
  11. CIHR (Canada Graduate Scholarship)
  12. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Scientist Development Award
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Pfizer
  15. Eli Lilly Foundation
  16. Open Society Institute
  17. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  18. NIH
  19. Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is lengthy, toxic, expensive, and has generally poor outcomes. We undertook an individual patient data meta-analysis to assess the impact on outcomes of the type, number, and duration of drugs used to treat MDR-TB. Methods and Findings: Three recent systematic reviews were used to identify studies reporting treatment outcomes of microbiologically confirmed MDR-TB. Study authors were contacted to solicit individual patient data including clinical characteristics, treatment given, and outcomes. Random effects multivariable logistic meta-regression was used to estimate adjusted odds of treatment success. Adequate treatment and outcome data were provided for 9,153 patients with MDR-TB from 32 observational studies. Treatment success, compared to failure/relapse, was associated with use of: later generation quinolones, (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.5 [95% CI 1.1-6.0]), ofloxacin (aOR: 2.5 [1.6-3.9]), ethionamide or prothionamide (aOR: 1.7 [1.3-2.3]), use of four or more likely effective drugs in the initial intensive phase (aOR: 2.3 [1.3-3.9]), and three or more likely effective drugs in the continuation phase (aOR: 2.7 [1.7-4.1]). Similar results were seen for the association of treatment success compared to failure/relapse or death: later generation quinolones, (aOR: 2.7 [1.7-4.3]), ofloxacin (aOR: 2.3 [1.3-3.8]), ethionamide or prothionamide (aOR: 1.7 [1.4-2.1]), use of four or more likely effective drugs in the initial intensive phase (aOR: 2.7 [1.9-3.9]), and three or more likely effective drugs in the continuation phase (aOR: 4.5 [3.4-6.0]). Conclusions: In this individual patient data meta-analysis of observational data, improved MDR-TB treatment success and survival were associated with use of certain fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, or prothionamide, and greater total number of effective drugs. However, randomized trials are urgently needed to optimize MDR-TB treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据