4.6 Article

Speciation and Introgression between Mimulus nasutus and Mimulus guttatus

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004410

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Georgia Research Foundation
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [1262645]
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [NIH RO1GM83098, RO1GM107374]
  5. NSF Bioinformatics postdoctoral fellowship [1002942]
  6. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1002942] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1350935] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [1262645] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus are an evolutionary and ecological model sister species pair differentiated by ecology, mating system, and partial reproductive isolation. Despite extensive research on this system, the history of divergence and differentiation in this sister pair is unclear. We present and analyze a population genomic data set which shows that M. nasutus budded from a central Californian M. guttatus population within the last 200 to 500 thousand years. In this time, the M. nasutus genome has accrued genomic signatures of the transition to predominant selfing, including an elevated proportion of nonsynonymous variants, an accumulation of premature stop codons, and extended levels of linkage disequilibrium. Despite clear biological differentiation, we document genomic signatures of ongoing, bidirectional introgression. We observe a negative relationship between the recombination rate and divergence between M. nasutus and sympatric M. guttatus samples, suggesting that selection acts against M. nasutus ancestry in M. guttatus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据