4.6 Article

Loci Associated with N-Glycosylation of Human Immunoglobulin G Show Pleiotropy with Autoimmune Diseases and Haematological Cancers

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003225

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (UK)
  2. Ministry of Science, Education, and Sport of the Republic of Croatia [108-1080315-0302]
  3. European Union framework program 6 European Special Populations Research Network project [LSHG-CT-2006-018947]
  4. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
  5. Royal Society
  6. European Union Framework Programme 6 EUROSPAN project [LSHG-CT-2006-018947]
  7. Croatian Ministry of Science, Education, and Sport [309-0061194-2023, 216-1080315-0302]
  8. Croatian Science Foundation [04-47]
  9. European Commission EuroGlycoArrays [215536]
  10. European Commission GlycoBioM [259869]
  11. European Commission HighGlycan [278535]
  12. National Natural Science Foundation
  13. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [NSFC31070727, 2012BAI37B03]
  14. Innovation-Oriented Research Program on Genomics [SenterNovem IGE05007]
  15. Centre for Medical Systems Biology
  16. Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing [050-060-810]
  17. Netherlands Genomics Initiative, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  18. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [259679]
  19. ARUK [M0600, M0651]
  20. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  21. Helmholtz-RFBR JRG grant [12-04-91322-C(sic)C_a]
  22. Dutch childhood oncology foundation KiKa
  23. MRC [MC_PC_U127561128] Funding Source: UKRI
  24. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127561128] Funding Source: researchfish
  25. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/710, CZB/4/728] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycosylation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) influences IgG effector function by modulating binding to Fc receptors. To identify genetic loci associated with IgG glycosylation, we quantitated N-linked IgG glycans using two approaches. After isolating IgG from human plasma, we performed 77 quantitative measurements of N-glycosylation using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) in 2,247 individuals from four European discovery populations. In parallel, we measured IgG N-glycans using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) in a replication cohort of 1,848 Europeans. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results identified 9 genome-wide significant loci (P<2.27x10(-9)) in the discovery analysis and two of the same loci (B4GALT1 and MGAT3) in the replication cohort. Four loci contained genes encoding glycosyltransferases (ST6GAL1, B4GALT1, FUT8, and MGAT3), while the remaining 5 contained genes that have not been previously implicated in protein glycosylation (IKZF1, IL6ST-ANKRD55, ABCF2-SMARCD3, SUV420H1, and SMARCB1-DERL3). However, most of them have been strongly associated with autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (e. g., systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, diabetes type 1, multiple sclerosis, Graves' disease, celiac disease, nodular sclerosis) and/or haematological cancers (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma). Follow-up functional experiments in haplodeficient Ikzf1 knock-out mice showed the same general pattern of changes in IgG glycosylation as identified in the meta-analysis. As IKZF1 was associated with multiple IgG N-glycan traits, we explored biomarker potential of affected N-glycans in 101 cases with SLE and 183 matched controls and demonstrated substantial discriminative power in a ROC-curve analysis (area under the curve=0.842). Our study shows that it is possible to identify new loci that control glycosylation of a single plasma protein using GWAS. The results may also provide an explanation for the reported pleiotropy and antagonistic effects of loci involved in autoimmune diseases and haematological cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据