4.6 Article

Predisposition to Cancer Caused by Genetic and Functional Defects of Mammalian Atad5

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002245

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHGRI, NIH
  2. NCI, NIH
  3. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-38096]
  5. Korean Research Foundation
  6. NIH [R01 CA140323, RO1-1CA112021-01]
  7. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
  8. NCI SPORE in breast cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital
  9. Avon Foundation
  10. [U01 CA113916]
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21390094, 23131505, 23651046, 23590380] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ATAD5, the human ortholog of yeast Elg1, plays a role in PCNA deubiquitination. Since PCNA modification is important to regulate DNA damage bypass, ATAD5 may be important for suppression of genomic instability in mammals in vivo. To test this hypothesis, we generated heterozygous (Atad5(+/m)) mice that were haploinsuffficient for Atad5. Atad5(+/m) mice displayed high levels of genomic instability in vivo, and Atad5(+/m) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) exhibited molecular defects in PCNA deubiquitination in response to DNA damage, as well as DNA damage hypersensitivity and high levels of genomic instability, apoptosis, and aneuploidy. Importantly, 90% of haploinsufficient Atad5(+/m) mice developed tumors, including sarcomas, carcinomas, and adenocarcinomas, between 11 and 20 months of age. High levels of genomic alterations were evident in tumors that arose in the Atad5(+/m) mice. Consistent with a role for Atad5 in suppressing tumorigenesis, we also identified somatic mutations of ATAD5 in 4.6% of sporadic human endometrial tumors, including two nonsense mutations that resulted in loss of proper ATAD5 function. Taken together, our findings indicate that loss-of-function mutations in mammalian Atad5 are sufficient to cause genomic instability and tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据