4.6 Article

Plasminogen Alleles Influence Susceptibility to Invasive Aspergillosis

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000101

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [K08AI065837]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [K08AI065837] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES011961, ZICES102546, ZIAES043010, Z01ES045005] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a common and life-threatening infection in immunocompromised individuals. A number of environmental and epidemiologic risk factors for developing IA have been identified. However, genetic factors that affect risk for developing IA have not been clearly identified. We report that host genetic differences influence outcome following establishment of pulmonary aspergillosis in an exogenously immune suppressed mouse model. Computational haplotype-based genetic analysis indicated that genetic variation within the biologically plausible positional candidate gene plasminogen (Plg; Gene ID 18855) correlated with murine outcome. There was a single nonsynonymous coding change (Gly110Ser) where the minor allele was found in all of the susceptible strains, but not in the resistant strains. A nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (Asp472Asn) was also identified in the human homolog (PLG; Gene ID 5340). An association study within a cohort of 236 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients revealed that alleles at this SNP significantly affected the risk of developing IA after HSCT. Furthermore, we demonstrated that plasminogen directly binds to Aspergillus fumigatus. We propose that genetic variation within the plasminogen pathway influences the pathogenesis of this invasive fungal infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据