4.6 Article

Probabilistic Approach to Predicting Substrate Specificity of Methyltransferases

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Polish Science (TEAM)
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N301 246436]
  3. Polish National Science Centre [2011/02/A/NZ2/00014]
  4. National Centre for Research and Development [PBS1/A9/16/2012]
  5. European Regional Development Fund under Innovative Economy Programme [POIG.01.01.02-14-054/09-00, POIG.02.02.00-14-024/08-00]
  6. NIH/NHLBI Proteomics Center for Airway Inflammation [HHSN268201000037C (N01-HV-00245)]
  7. NIH [UL1TR000071 UTMB]
  8. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N301 192139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a general probabilistic framework for predicting the substrate specificity of enzymes. We designed this approach to be easily applicable to different organisms and enzymes. Therefore, our predictive models do not rely on species-specific properties and use mostly sequence-derived data. Maximum Likelihood optimization is used to fine-tune model parameters and the Akaike Information Criterion is employed to overcome the issue of correlated variables. As a proof-of-principle, we apply our approach to predicting general substrate specificity of yeast methyltransferases (MTases). As input, we use several physico-chemical and biological properties of MTases: structural fold, isoelectric point, expression pattern and cellular localization. Our method accurately predicts whether a yeast MTase methylates a protein, RNA or another molecule. Among our experimentally tested predictions, 89% were confirmed, including the surprising prediction that YOR021C is the first known MTase with a SPOUT fold that methylates a substrate other than RNA (protein). Our approach not only allows for highly accurate prediction of functional specificity of MTases, but also provides insight into general rules governing MTase substrate specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据