4.6 Article

Adaptable Functionality of Transcriptional Feedback in Bacterial Two-Component Systems

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000676

关键词

-

资金

  1. Keck Center for Interdisciplinary Bioscience Training of the Gulf Coast Consortia [5T15LM007093]
  2. NSF [MCB-0845919, MCB-0920463, EIA-0216467]
  3. Rice University, Sun Microsystems, and Sigma Solutions, Inc
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0920463] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A widespread mechanism of bacterial signaling occurs through two-component systems, comprised of a sensor histidine kinase (SHK) and a transcriptional response regulator (RR). The SHK activates RR by phosphorylation. The most common two-component system structure involves expression from a single operon, the transcription of which is activated by its own phosphorylated RR. The role of this feedback is poorly understood, but it has been associated with an overshooting kinetic response and with fast recovery of previous interrupted signaling events in different systems. Mathematical models show that overshoot is only attainable with negative feedback that also improves response time. Our models also predict that fast recovery of previous interrupted signaling depends on high accumulation of SHK and RR, which is more likely in a positive feedback regime. We use Monte Carlo sampling of the parameter space to explore the range of attainable model behaviors. The model predicts that the effective feedback sign can change from negative to positive depending on the signal level. Variations in two-component system architectures and parameters may therefore have evolved to optimize responses in different bacterial lifestyles. We propose a conceptual model where low signal conditions result in a responsive system with effectively negative feedback while high signal conditions with positive feedback favor persistence of system output.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据