4.6 Article

The Gene Ontology's Reference Genome Project: A Unified Framework for Functional Annotation across Species

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000431

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH-NHGRI P41 [HG002273, HG000330, HG001315, HG02223, HG002659-06]
  2. USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service [MISV-329140]
  3. NIH [GM64426, HG00022, HD033745]
  4. NIGMS [U24GM07790]
  5. Medical Research Council [G0500293]
  6. EMBL
  7. British Heart Foundation [SP/07/007/23671]
  8. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL64541]
  9. NSF [DBI-0417062]
  10. British Heart Foundation [SP/07/007/23671] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [G0500293] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. MRC [G0500293] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Gene Ontology (GO) is a collaborative effort that provides structured vocabularies for annotating the molecular function, biological role, and cellular location of gene products in a highly systematic way and in a species-neutral manner with the aim of unifying the representation of gene function across different organisms. Each contributing member of the GO Consortium independently associates GO terms to gene products from the organism(s) they are annotating. Here we introduce the Reference Genome project, which brings together those independent efforts into a unified framework based on the evolutionary relationships between genes in these different organisms. The Reference Genome project has two primary goals: to increase the depth and breadth of annotations for genes in each of the organisms in the project, and to create data sets and tools that enable other genome annotation efforts to infer GO annotations for homologous genes in their organisms. In addition, the project has several important incidental benefits, such as increasing annotation consistency across genome databases, and providing important improvements to the GO's logical structure and biological content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据