4.3 Review

Effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions in persons with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 358-369

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.011

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Telerehabilitation; Disability; Impairment; Participation

资金

  1. Rehabilitation Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park Campus, Melbourne, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Telerehabilitation, a service delivery model using telecommunications technology to provide therapy at a distance, is used in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), but evidence for their effectiveness is yet to be determined. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of telerehabilitation intervention pwMS. Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using medical and health science electronic databases. Three reviewers selected potential studies and independently assessed the methodological quality. A meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity amongst included trials, and a qualitative analysis was performed for best evidence synthesis. Results: Ten RCTs and 2 observational studies (n=564 participants) investigated a wide variety of telerehabilitation intervention in pwMS, which included: physical activity; educational, behavioural and symptom management programmes. All studies scored low to moderate on the methodological quality assessment implying high risk of bias. Overall, the review found low level evidence for the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on reducing short-term disability and reducing and/or improving symptoms, such as fatigue. There was low level evidence suggesting some benefit of telerehabilitation in improving functional activities; improving symptoms in the longer-term; and psychological outcomes and quality of life. There is limited data on safety, process evaluation and no data on cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation. Conclusions: A wide range of telerehabilitation is used in pwMS, however, the quality of evidence on these interventions was low. More robust trials are needed to build evidence about these interventions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据