4.6 Article

Network Features of the Mammalian Circadian Clock

期刊

PLOS BIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 563-575

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000052

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) P50 Conte Center [MH074924]
  2. Joseph S. Takahashi, Project Principal Investigator JBH
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R01 NS054794]
  4. Pennsylvania Commonwealth Health Research Formula Funds
  5. Clinical and Translational Science Award [1U54-RR-023567]
  6. Pew Scholars Program in Biomedical Sciences
  7. Dana Foundation
  8. Whitehall Foundation
  9. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [EY016807]
  10. National Research Service Award (NRSA) [1F32GM082083-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mammalian circadian clock is a cell-autonomous system that drives oscillations in behavior and physiology in anticipation of daily environmental change. To assess the robustness of a human molecular clock, we systematically depleted known clock components and observed that circadian oscillations are maintained over a wide range of disruptions. We developed a novel strategy termed Gene Dosage Network Analysis (GDNA) in which small interfering RNA (siRNA)-induced dose-dependent changes in gene expression were used to build gene association networks consistent with known biochemical constraints. The use of multiple doses powered the analysis to uncover several novel network features of the circadian clock, including proportional responses and signal propagation through interacting genetic modules. We also observed several examples where a gene is up-regulated following knockdown of its paralog, suggesting the clock network utilizes active compensatory mechanisms rather than simple redundancy to confer robustness and maintain function. We propose that these network features act in concert as a genetic buffering system to maintain clock function in the face of genetic and environmental perturbation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据