4.7 Article

Chiral Spin-Density Wave, Spin-Charge-Chern Liquid, and d plus id Superconductivity in 1/4-Doped Correlated Electronic Systems on the Honeycomb Lattice

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.031040

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alfred P. Sloan foundation
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1151440]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1151440] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, two interesting candidate quantum phases-the chiral spin-density wave state featuring anomalous quantum Hall effect and the d + id superconductor-were proposed for the Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice at 1/4 doping. Using a combination of exact diagonalization, density matrix renormalization group, the variational Monte Carlo method, and quantum field theories, we study the quantum phase diagrams of both the Hubbard model and the t-J model on the honeycomb lattice at 1/4 doping. The main advantage of our approach is the use of symmetry quantum numbers of ground-state wave functions on finite-size systems (up to 32 sites) to sharply distinguish different quantum phases. Our results show that for 1 less than or similar to U/t < 40 in the Hubbard model and for 0.1 < J/t < 0.80(2) in the t-J model, the quantum ground state is either a chiral spin-density wave state or a spin-charge-Chern liquid, but not a d + id superconductor. However, in the t-J model, upon increasing J, the system goes through a first-order phase transition at J/t 0.80(2) into the d + id superconductor. Here, the spin-charge-Chern liquid state is a new type of topologically ordered quantum phase with Abelian anyons and fractionalized excitations. Experimental signatures of these quantum phases, such as tunneling conductance, are calculated. These results are discussed in the context of 1/4-doped graphene systems and other correlated electronic materials on the honeycomb lattice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据