4.0 Article

Nucleus accumbens core and pathogenesis of compulsive checking

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 26, 期 1-2, 页码 200-216

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000112

关键词

animal model; compulsive checking behavior; hyperactivity; nucleus accumbens core; obsessive-compulsive disorder; quinpirole; rat; security motivation system

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR MOP-64424]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN A0544]
  3. Ontario Mental Health Foundation
  4. Fundacion Espanola de Psiquiatria y Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the role of the nucleus accumbens core (NAc) in the development of quinpirole-induced compulsive checking, rats received an excitotoxic lesion of NAc or sham lesion and were injected with quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg) or saline; development of checking behavior was monitored for 10 biweekly tests. The results showed that even after the NAc lesion, quinpirole still induced compulsive checking, suggesting that the pathogenic effects produced by quinpirole lie outside the NAc. Although the NAc lesion did not prevent the induction of compulsive checking, it altered how quickly it develops, suggesting that the NAc normally contributes toward the induction of compulsive checking. Saline-treated rats with an NAc lesion were hyperactive, but did not develop compulsive checking, indicating that hyperactivity by itself is not sufficient for the pathogenesis of compulsive checking. It is proposed that compulsive checking is the exaggerated output of a security motivation system and that the NAc serves as a neural hub for coordinating the orderly activity of neural modules of this motivational system. Evidence is considered suggesting that the neurobiological condition for the pathogenesis of compulsive checking is two-fold: activation of dopamine D2/D3 receptors without concurrent stimulation of D1-like receptors and long-term plastic changes related to quinpirole-induced sensitization. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据