4.6 Article

Harnessing charge and exciton distribution towards extremely high performance: the critical role of guests in single-emitting-layer white OLEDs

期刊

MATERIALS HORIZONS
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 536-544

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5mh00051c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National 973 Project of China [2015CB655000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61401156, U1301243]
  3. Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program [201101C0105067115]
  4. Educational Commission of Guangdong Province [2014KZDXM010, 2014GKXM012]
  5. National Laboratory for Infrared Physics Open Project [M201406]
  6. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan [2013Y2-00114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, high efficiency, low efficiency roll-off and stable color white organic light-emitting diodes (WOLEDs) are still challenging to realize via simplified structures. Herein, the simplicity/extremely high efficiency/low efficiency roll-off/stable color trade-off has been accomplished in a single-emitting-layer (single-EML) phosphorescent WOLED. The WOLED exhibits total efficiencies of 111.7 cd A(-1) and 75.5 mu m W-1 at a practical luminance of 1000 cd m(-2), these efficiencies are the highest among single-EML WOLEDs. Even at 5000 cd m(-2), the efficiencies remain as high as 101.3 cd A(-1) and 58.8 mu m W-1. Besides, the color variation in the whole range of luminances is (0.00, 0.00), which is the first single-EML WOLED with an extremely stable color. The origin of the high performance is unveiled. Particularly, the role of guests, which is often ignored in single-EML WOLEDs, on the origin of the color-stability is systematically revealed and harnessing charge and exciton distribution by using multifunctional guests is demonstrated to be critical for stabilizing the color. Such marvelous results not only represent a significant step towards the realization of simplified WOLEDs, but also provide a new opportunity to achieve extremely stable colors [DCIE (Commission International de I'Eclairage) = (0.00, 0.00)].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据