4.5 Article

The effects of weight loss after bariatric surgery on health-related quality of life and depression

期刊

NUTRITION & DIABETES
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nutd.2014.29

关键词

-

资金

  1. Clinical Translational Science Center (CTSC) [UL1-RR024996]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: In severe obesity, impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and dysphoric mood are reported. This is a post-surgery analysis of the relationship between HRQoL and depressive symptoms, and weight change after four different types of bariatric procedures. METHODS: A total of 105 consented patients completed the Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) before and 25 months after surgery. Analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test evaluated changes. RESULTS: Patients with Roux-en Y gastric bypass (46 patients), decreased body mass indexes (BMIs; kg m(-2)) 47-31 kg m(-2) (P < 0.0001); biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (18 patients), decreased BMIs 57-30 kg m(-2) (P < 0.0001); adjustable gastric banding (18 patients), decreased BMIs 45-38 kg m(-2) (P < 0.0001); and sleeve gastrectomies (23 patients), decreased BMIs 58 42 kg m(-2) (P < 0.0001). The excess percentage BMI loss was 69, 89, 36 and 53 kg m(-2), respectively (P < 0.0001). Before surgery, the SF-36 differences were significant regarding bodily pain (P = 0.008) and social functioning (P = 0.01). After surgery, physical function (P = 0.03), general health (P = 0.05) and physical component (P = 0.03) were different. IWQOL-Lite recorded no differences until after surgery: physical function (P = 0.003), sexual life (P = 0.04) and public distress (P = 0.003). BDI scores were not different for the four groups at baseline. All improved with surgery, 10.6-4.4 (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL and depressive symptoms significantly improvement after surgery. These improvements do not have a differential effect over the wide range of weight change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据