4.6 Article

Repeated nebulisation of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial

期刊

LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 684-691

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00245-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Trust
  2. Medicor Foundation
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network
  4. Just Gene Therapy
  5. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. NIHR
  8. NHS Research Scotland, through the Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility
  9. NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  10. NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London
  11. MRC [MC_PC_12033, G0800803] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [G0800803, MC_PC_12033] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10157] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Lung delivery of plasmid DNA encoding the CFTR gene complexed with a cationic liposome is a potential treatment option for patients with cystic fibrosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Methods We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial in two cystic fibrosis centres with patients recruited from 18 sites in the UK. Patients (aged >= 12 years) with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 50-90% predicted and any combination of CFTR mutations, were randomly assigned, via a computer-based randomisation system, to receive 5 mL of either nebulised pGM169/GL67A gene-liposome complex or 0.9% saline (placebo) every 28 days (plus or minus 5 days) for 1 year. Randomisation was stratified by % predicted FEV1 (<70 vs >= 70%), age (<18 vs >= 18 years), inclusion in the mechanistic substudy, and dosing site (London or Edinburgh). Participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the relative change in % predicted FEV1. The primary analysis was per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01621867. Findings Between June 12, 2012, and June 24, 2013, we randomly assigned 140 patients to receive placebo (n=62) or pGM169/GL67A (n=78), of whom 116 (83%) patients comprised the per-protocol population. We noted a significant, albeit modest, treatment effect in the pGM169/GL67A group versus placebo at 12 months' follow-up (3.7%, 95% CI 0.1-7.3; p=0.046). This outcome was associated with a stabilisation of lung function in the pGM169/GL67A group compared with a decline in the placebo group. We recorded no significant difference in treatment-attributable adverse events between groups. Interpretation Monthly application of the pGM169/GL67A gene therapy formulation was associated with a significant, albeit modest, benefit in FEV1 compared with placebo at 1 year, indicating a stabilisation of lung function in the treatment group. Further improvements in efficacy and consistency of response to the current formulation are needed before gene therapy is suitable for clinical care; however, our findings should also encourage the rapid introduction of more potent gene transfer vectors into early phase trials. Copyright (C) Alton et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据