4.0 Article

Deletions and duplications of the 22q11.2 region in spermatozoa from DiGeorge/velocardiofacial fathers

期刊

MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13039-014-0086-3

关键词

Deletions and duplications; DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome; Non-allelic homologous recombination; Spermatozoa

资金

  1. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona [CF-180034, PIF/2012]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya, SPAIN [2014SGR-00524]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Inovacion [SAF 2010-22241]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome (DGS/VCFS) is the most common deletion syndrome in humans. Low copy repeats flanking the 22q11.2 region confer a substrate for non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) events leading to rearrangements. This study sought to identify DGS/VCFS fathers with increased susceptibility to deletions and duplications at the 22q11.2 region in spermatozoa and to assess the particular contribution of intra-chromatid and/or inter-chromatid NAHR. Semen samples from nine DGS/VCFS fathers were analyzed by triple-color FISH using a probe combination that discriminated between normal, deleted and duplicated genotypes. Microsatellite analysis were performed in the parents and the affected children to determine the parental origin of the deleted chromosome 22. Results: A significant increase in 22q11.2 deletions was observed in the sperm of two out of nine DGS/VCFS fathers (odds ratio 2.03-fold, P < 0.01), and in both cases the deletion in the offspring was transmitted by the father. Patients with significant increases in sperm anomalies presented a disturbed deletion: duplication 1:1 ratio (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Altogether, results support that intra-chromatid NAHR is the mechanism responsible for the higher rate of sperm deletions, which is directly related to the transmission of the deleted chromosome 22 to offspring. Accordingly, the screening of sperm anomalies in the 22q11.2 region should be taken into account in the genetic counseling of DGS/VCFS families.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据