4.4 Article

Effects of NB001 and gabapentin on irritable bowel syndrome-induced behavioral anxiety and spontaneous pain

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-7-47

关键词

Irritable bowel syndrome; Zymosan; Visceral pain; Spontaneous pain; Anxiety

资金

  1. Canada Research Chair, Canadian Institute for Health Research [258523]
  2. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) [RGPIN 402555]
  3. Azrieli Foundation and Brain Canada
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31010103909, 81371239]
  5. China Scholarship Council
  6. Fragile X research foundation of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by recurrent abdominal discomfort, spontaneous pain, colorectal hypersensitivity and bowel dysfunction. Patients with IBS also suffer from emotional anxiety and depression. However, few animal studies have investigated IBS-induced spontaneous pain and behavioral anxiety. In this study, we assessed spontaneous pain and anxiety behaviors in an adult mouse model of IBS induced by zymosan administration. By using Fos protein as a marker, we found that sensory and emotion related brain regions were activated at day 7 after the treatment with zymosan; these regions include the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex and amygdala. Behaviorally, zymosan administration triggered spontaneous pain (decreased spontaneous activities in the open field test) and increased anxiety-like behaviors in three different tests (the open field, elevated plus maze and light/dark box tests). Intraperitoneal injection of NB001, an adenylyl cyclase 1 (AC1) inhibitor, reduced spontaneous pain but had no significant effect on behavioral anxiety. In contrast, gabapentin reduced both spontaneous pain and behavioral anxiety. These results indicate that NB001 and gabapentin may inhibit spontaneous pain and anxiety-like behaviors through different mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据