4.4 Review

Alzheimer's disease Aβ assemblies mediating rapid disruption of synaptic plasticity and memory

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-5-25

关键词

Amyloidogenic proteins; Long-term potentiation; Long-term depression; Alzheimer's disease; Neurodegenerative diseases; alpha-synuclein oligomers; PrP oligomers

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland
  2. Health Research Board of Ireland
  3. European Commission [MEMOLOAD 201159]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by episodic memory impairment that often precedes clinical diagnosis by many years. Probing the mechanisms of such impairment may provide much needed means of diagnosis and therapeutic intervention at an early, pre-dementia, stage. Prior to the onset of significant neurodegeneration, the structural and functional integrity of synapses in mnemonic circuitry is severely compromised in the presence of amyloidosis. This review examines recent evidence evaluating the role of amyloid-beta protein (A beta) in causing rapid disruption of synaptic plasticity and memory impairment. We evaluate the relative importance of different sizes and conformations of A beta, including monomer, oligomer, protofibril and fibril. We pay particular attention to recent controversies over the relevance to the pathophysiology of AD of different water soluble A beta aggregates and the importance of cellular prion protein in mediating their effects. Current data are consistent with the view that both low-n oligomers and larger soluble assemblies present in AD brain, some of them via a direct interaction with cellular prion protein, cause synaptic memory failure. At the two extremes of aggregation, monomers and fibrils appear to act in vivo both as sources and sinks of certain metastable conformations of soluble aggregates that powerfully disrupt synaptic plasticity. The same principle appears to apply to other synaptotoxic amyloidogenic proteins including tau, alpha-synuclein and prion protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据